| 
	
	
		| 
				
					|  | Cure diabetes - do you have a hungry beast inside? |  |  
					|  | 
 © Colin Austin  
					This documents conforms to creative commons. 
					It may be freely copied but the author must be recognised 
					and it cannot be used for commercial purposes. 5 Jan 2015
 
 
 Abstract
						But it is addictive - the same as 
					tobacco, alcohol and the drugs. This is the hungry beast 
					inside.
							|  | One of the worst modern inventions must be high 
							fructose corn syrup, it is cheaper and sweeter than 
							even refined sugar and is virtually everywhere in 
							processed foods from packed soup to hamburgers. |  
 For a healthy twelve year old sugars and carbs are great, it 
					give them a massive burst of energy as the body produces 
					bulk insulin to release the energy. But this takes a toll as 
					the body becomes resistant to insulin and the pancreas (that 
					produced the insulin) has to works harder leading to insulin 
					deficiency and intolerance. Diabetes here we come.
 
 The excess sugar is then converted to fat in the liver 
					leading to the sister illnesses - heart attacks, strokes and 
					cancer - here we come again.
 
 Many professional doctors and dieticians say that this can 
					be stopped or even reversed simply by changing the diet to 
					include fresh green vegetables - so easy right? But the fact 
					is that diabetes and the sister illnesses far from going 
					away are increasing at an alarming rate making them the 
					greatest health issue of our time.
 
 There is a major gap between theory and practice. Why?
 
 While virtually all doctors and dieticians recommend eating 
					more vegetables changing diet is easier said than done.
 
 These articles aims looks at why and what can be done about 
					it using wicking baskets to grow your own food and how to 
					cook it so it actually tastes good.
 
 
 Why processed sugars and carbs are so dangerous.Carbs and sugars, (particularly high fructose corn syrup) 
					are addictive and dangerous - but they need not be. Our 
					bodies need sugar - there is nothing intrinsically bad about 
					sugar - it is simply that the sugar hidden away in 
					supermarket food is so highly processed that it is 
					immediately absorbed by our bodies leading to a sugar spike.
 
 Our bodies respond by going berserk and pumping insulin to 
					counter the sugar, in a healthy body this insulin is so 
					effective that it rapidly mobilises the insulin so this high 
					is followed by a ‘low’. We feel hungry again and will eat 
					more sugary food. This is the hungry beast at work.
 
 However if this goes on and on we can become insulin 
					resistant - we have diabetes - get fat and are prone to 
					heart attacks, strokes, cancer and other horrids.
 
 The cause is the sugar spike rather than the sugar itself.
 
 Worse - often a sugary diet is lacking vitamins and 
					minerals. Technically this is easy to solve - eat more green 
					vegetables grown in nutrient rich soil. Green vegetables, 
					particularly those with a lot of fibre, slow down our 
					digestion so avoiding the sugar spike.
 
 All sounds good but there is a gap between what the medical 
					text books say and the real world. People on a high sugar 
					diet just don’t like eating a lot of vegetables. They know 
					full well they are healthy and they should eat them - but 
					they don’t.
 
 What makes is worse is that a lot of supermarket vegetables 
					are genetically selected for transport and storage and are 
					force fed so they simply do not taste good or contain the 
					essential vitamins and minerals.
 
 
 This is personal
						
							|  | This is a real problem I have faced at a personal level, my 
					wife Xiulan is diabetic and recently broke several bones in 
					her foot which started to turn black - not at all good. 
					Diabetes is the most common cause of amputation and 
					blindness. 
 But Xiulan is a highly intelligent lady; she is a qualified 
					surgeon and well understands the issues. She is in 
					considerable pain with her foot so has every reason to be 
					motivated.
 |  Yet she still craves after the high carb foods and simply 
					will not eat the needed vegetables to balance the carbs. 
					This is not a question of science or logic, at an 
					intellectual level she fully understands but there is a 
					fundamental difference between the intellect and the 
					emotions.
 
 This is a problem that not just we face - it is at the heart 
					of why diabetes and its sister deceases are expanding so 
					rapidly to become the world greatest health hazard.
 
 Here I 
					want to analysis why. How is it when the best brains in the 
					business agree and when the solution appears to be so simple 
					- that the world seems unable to resolve the problem.
 
 Contradictory adviceGoogle alerts may be no substitute for formal training in a 
					particular discipline but they do give an enormous range of 
					views. Nowhere is this more evident than in diet.
 The first conflict is between fats and sugars. It may seem 
					obvious that eating fats will make you fat but that is not 
					necessarily true, sugars - it turns out - are greater source 
					of people becoming fat, particularly in the critical organs 
					like the liver.
 
 This has led so some extreme diets such as the Atkins diet 
					and its offspring which advocate the almost complete 
					elimination of sugars and carbs. The theory is that the body 
					still needs energy and if there is no sugars or carbs will 
					break down fat in the body to provide this energy.
 
 See how well this theory works at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3I02aVkdi_M. 
					Another video in which experts from the various camps debate 
					is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdxVfi632Xw
 
 Just watching google alerts on diet and health will show the 
					number of weird and wonderful diets. Some like the Paleo 
					diet are quite comic in their logic ignoring the fact that 
					in the paleo times the life span was only twenty eight 
					years. Most died younger with just a few reaching old age. 
					Their role was to look after the young - a key role which 
					explains why human life extends well beyond the child 
					rearing age - the parents were simply too busy getting food.
 
 On top of that there are the clear quacks offering typically 
					some magic potion obtained from some exotic plant from some 
					remote country. But the quacks are easy to spot. It is so 
					simple - look for an abstract or summary that give you the 
					key information up front.
 
 The producers of these videos are obviously unaware how 
					their high pressure promotion - trying to keep you in 
					suspense until almost the last minute - clearly identifies 
					them as quacks. The very last minute (if you watch that 
					long) is when they ask you for money.
 
 People are intrinsically differentVery few experts or quacks recognise the variety among 
					people - what works for one person may be totally 
					inappropriate for others.
 Just look at some of the vast numbers of papers published on 
					diet. The serious scientific papers are all subject to 
					statistical analysis. (The papers showing Mrs Pumpkin from 
					Memphis lost 100Kg in after two months are meaningless. It 
					may be true that Mrs Pumpkin did loose 100Kg but that does 
					not mean that you will.)
 
 The genuine statistical analysis may show real trends - but 
					they are still trends and they often not that strong. Maybe 
					the numbers of cases of overweight or diabetes are reduced 
					by 20%.
 
 The net results is simply confusion and disbelieve among 
					those looking for real help with their diet so most do the 
					obvious and just ignore the huff and puff.
 
 Diets based on some magic formulae rarely work - you have to 
					spend the time working out how your body works.
 
 Learning how you workDiets which aim to restrict calorie intake rarely work. 
					Eventually people just get hungry and pig out. This craving 
					for food is not even us; it is the microbes in our stomach 
					sending chemical signals (neurotransmitter) to our brain. 
					These neurotransmitters are incredibly difficult to resist - 
					you just crave for that particular food. These cravings are 
					part of the survival mechanism - and the vast majority of 
					people eventually give in.
 These are very difficult to resist.
 
 We have to self-experiment and find out which food sets up 
					the cravings and which foods supress the hunger. I know for 
					me that I have an addiction to Pizza. Surprisingly I find 
					that dark chocolate (without sugar) is a hunger suppressant. 
					But that is just me - it does not mean that it will apply to 
					you.
 
 We also have to recognise that these craving come from the 
					bacteria in our guts sending out neurotransmitters. It can 
					take several weeks of a revised diet for us to change our 
					gut bacteria from those that cause harmful cravings to those 
					that stop us feeling hungry.
 
 I have no solution for this - for a few weeks you just have 
					to sweat it out.
 
 The aim must be to substitute with a non-fattening food. For 
					most people it seems that vegetables really do work. We know 
					that the fibre in vegetables act as a hunger suppressant.
 
 The message is clear, forget about slimming diets and eat 
					more vegetables.
 
 Food obsessionsPatient compliance is a term which is widely used in the 
					medical profession and seems to ignore just how deeply 
					ingrained our food preferences are. For example my wife 
					Xiulan just will not eat uncooked vegetables. It is not a 
					question that she does not understand the health benefits - 
					she simply cannot put them in here mouth - there is some 
					overriding force preventing her. I have an ingrained fear of 
					wobbly ladders - it is not a question of logic - it is the 
					way we are.
 I could put this down to simply obstinacy on her part but it 
					is not - there is some ingrained physiological factor which 
					prevents her - presumably some form of primitive protection 
					system. On reflection I can relate to this - I am a typical 
					omnivore who can eat almost any food - but there are some 
					exceptions. My Chinese granddaughter looks on fish eyes as 
					some form of delicacy - but there is just no way I could put 
					an eye of a living creature into my mouth - however good or 
					beneficial I am told it may be.
 
 Xiulan will quite happily scrape the brains out of a lobster 
					head and thoroughly enjoy them - but cannot eat a lettuce. 
					Humans are all different and a bit weird - it is not a 
					question of logic but innate feelings, we just have to 
					design diets around these.
 
 This was brought home to me in the period when I was 
					involved in looking to provide sustenance food in Ethiopia. 
					My involvement was how to overcome water shortage and this 
					is how the wicking bed system evolved - as a cheap way of 
					providing water in times of drought.
 
 But a co-worker with me had what I thought was a major 
					advance in food security. He had isolated some trees growing 
					in Central Australia which were used by the native 
					population as a reliable food resource. The climatic 
					conditions were similar to Ethiopia and he did trials which 
					showed that once established they would grow well. To me 
					this seemed a major breakthrough. Yet the sad truth is that 
					the bulk of the people just were not prepared to accept this 
					plant which was new to them as a food source.
 
 
						
							|  | Now to me this was pretty amazing. Before this I had no 
					experience of starving people. Mothers were watching their 
					babies die because they had no food and hence no milk. 
 For 
					me this was a highly emotional experience yet this food 
					prejudice was so strong that they just would not change 
					their diet.
 |  
 The economic juggernautGoogle alerts will show the high level of aggression from 
					the public towards our food industry - which is the world’s 
					largest industry controlled by a small number of 
					international giant companies. They are portrayed as some 
					form of giant evil empire.
 This is not true - they are in business to make as much 
					money as possible for their shareholders - typically 
					dominated by the large financial institutions. If the boards 
					fail to make enough money they are simply kicked out and 
					replaced by others that will. This is the rules of the game. 
					They are not in business to protect our health - that is 
					every individual responsibility - and if we buy it they will 
					continue to supply it.
 
 True Governments are there to provide some level of 
					protection but in reality there is not much that they can do 
					against the power of these international organisations. They 
					can ensure standards of hygiene - give some protection 
					against the use of toxic chemicals and ensure some 
					conformity of labelling. But that is really as far as it 
					goes.
 
 The net result is food that is high in sugars – 
					(particularly the toxic high fructose corn syrup), low in 
					nutrients and with varieties selected (or in some cases 
					genetically modified) for the benefits of the food system - 
					e.g. shelf appearance, long shelf life, resistance to damage 
					in transit etc.
 
 The net result may be highly undesirable with a spiral 
					health problem starting from excess fat in our organs and 
					leading to the deceases of diabetes, heart attack, stroke, 
					cancer etc. But it is not ‘their’ fault – however ‘their’ is 
					- it is our fault (or largely our fault) because we buy the 
					stuff they want to sell.
 
 That’s the system and in reality we cannot change it.
 
 
 So what do we do about it?People are already doing something about it. Farmers markets 
					are well established, there is a viable organic food 
					industry, many people with large gardens are growing their 
					own food and there are various food cooperatives and a 
					health food industry (sometimes genuine sometimes a con).
 And how well are they working? Well for some - particularly 
					the more affluent who can afford to pay two or three times 
					the price of supermarket food - quite well. But it is 
					clearly not working for the majority or people. The 
					statistics show the ever expanding increase in diabetes and 
					its sister deceases.
 
 So what could I do about this? The answer to me was a system 
					which would enable anyone to grow their own food.
 
 
 
						
							|  | My life’s work has been in innovation. My pioneering work 
					with Moldflow changed an industry and my work on wicking 
					beds has helped thousands of people around the world to grow 
					their own food. |  Now my current work is on the wicking basket - a system 
					which I want to make as simple, cheap and reliable that 
					anyone can grow healthy food.
 
 This is the subject of my next article.
 
 However I really understand that people will only start 
					eating vegetables if they really taste good. Now I am no 
					Jammie Oliver but my third article in this series will focus 
					on my attempts to prepare and cook vegetables so they 
					actually taste good. This is a typical innovation project - 
					lots of failures with the occasional success.
 
 Colin Austin
 
 
 |  |   |  |